"Mortgage rates typically track those of 10-year and 30-year Treasury and other government bonds. Yields, or interest rates, on those notes have been "rising amid lender concerns that the White House’s deal with Congress on Dec. 7. to extend the Bush-era tax cuts and the Federal Reserve’s move in early November to buy back $600 billion in debt to stimulate economic growth will combine to fuel inflation and swell the budget deficit."
“A servicer might, for example, deny a loan modification to a borrower because it also owns a second mortgage on the same property and doesn’t want to write down that asset, as required in a modification. Levying outsize default fees is another tactic — the fees typically go to the servicer, not the lender, but they can still propel a property into foreclosure more quickly. And foreclosures aren’t a good outcome for investors. “The result in once such case was a federal jury’s award to investors of several millions of dollars in punitive damages.
“Almost immediately, the plaintiffs in the suit contended, Compass/Silar started siphoning off money owed to investors holding the loans. Among the servicer’s tactics, the plaintiffs said, were improperly charging default interest, late fees and loan origination fees that reduced amounts due to investors.”In addition, when borrowers tried to renegotiate or pay-off defaulted loans, the servicing company refused to negotiate. “In other cases when Compass/Silar urged the investors to modify troubled mortgages, the servicer reaped undisclosed fees in the deals.”
“A Silar spokesman said the firm was pleased that the jury awarded only $79,000 in compensatory damages to the plaintiffs but was disappointed by the punitive-damages assessment. “The jurors are to be commended for their careful consideration of the facts in a very lengthy trial,” the spokesman said. He declined to comment as to whether Silar was currently servicing any loans.”
“It is obvious that we are in the litigation stage of the financial debacle of 2008. That usually means shining the light on dark corners and watching what scurries away. The view may not be pretty, but at least in this case, investors got some recompense in addition to an education.”A former employer gave me this saying about the business place - In some markets the bulls eat, in some the bears eat, but the pigs always get the garbage.
"has become increasingly concerned about the accuracy and reliability of documents submitted to the Office of Foreclosure."Of course, nothing is said of the substance of the "irregularities" or about the underlying fact that the loans are in default. More to follow.
A special master could be appointed to review the foreclosure practices of companies including Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase and Citibank.
“As least until recently, we’ve been in the midst of a refinancing boom. So consumers applying for refinancings should at least expect some delays.
“While lenders are leery about releasing details about how long refinancings are taking to close today versus a year ago, some are willing to admit that processing times are longer today for a number of reasons, including regulatory changes and historically low rates.”I’m not sure of the “refinance boom” since most home values in New Jersey fell dramatically over the past two years.
“Kris Yamamoto, a spokeswoman for Bank of America, said in an e-mail that the longer processing times are the result of the “dramatic changes” the mortgage environment has undergone in recent years, including “new underwriting standards being enforced and regulatory changes enacted” to ensure that consumers can safely afford their mortgages. She also pointed to the low rates.”How about the family that can afford its current mortgage but wishes to take advantage of a lower rate? Unless you had 30% equity, or more, in your home when you took your last mortgage, you can pretty much forget about it since home values have fallen as much as that number. Lenders will not make 100% loan to value mortgages despite encouragement by the Federal government.
“For months now, experts have been debating the fate of the home mortgage interest deduction (MID). So why exactly are politicians targeting the MID? With a federal deficit of around $13 trillion, officials are hard-pressed to find ways to curb the growing the debt.
“ Some say there are better options available than keeping the MID, following suit of many European nations who have in recent years nixed the deductions themselves, but the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) disagrees. They feel that this deduction is a strong incentive for homeownership. For nearly 100 years homeowners have been allowed to deduct the interest paid on mortgages for their primary residences, second homes and most home equity lines of credit.”Frankly, the deduction of mortgage interest helped expand primary- and second-home ownership. Although not the primary incentive to home ownership, the deduction, when taken into account for budget planning, allows the buyer to buy a little bigger and better than her net income will allow. Call it a subsidy, if you will.
“NAR President Ron Phipps, states, "Recent progress has been made in bringing stability to the housing market and any changes to the MID now or in the future could critically erode home prices and the value of homes by as much as 15 percent, according to our research. This would negatively impact home ownership for millions of Americans, including those who own their homes outright and have no mortgage."
“Will Washington continue to allow taxpayers who own their homes to reduce their taxable income by the interest paid on the loan? Time will tell. It is dependent on finding alternative ways to curb growing anxiety over our growing debt.”Good luck to us all.
“As the year winds down, many homeowners fear that now could be a bad time to sell their home. While it’s true that the holidays can deter some folks from house hunting and making a major purchase—don’t give up.”The recommendation to sellers:
“ If your house is on the market, step up the action plan to draw attention to it. Don’t let the holiday blues make you feel like there’s no hope. Homes are sold and bought this time of year. But the ones that get snatched up are the ones that are enticing to buyers.”There are some things you can do to make your home more “showable”.
“A good rule of thumb, is to keep decor simple and subtle. If you celebrate Christmas, go ahead and put a tree up but don’t put one up in every room. Remember that buyers will be looking at your home and imagining their own holiday celebrations there. So, be sure to leave them room to envision their lives in the home.
“This goes for the outside too. Holiday lights can be placed outside very tastefully but ditch the huge inflatable characters that make it look like your yard is an amusement park. Instead, opt for a nice holiday wreath and some subtle seasonal decor. Keep in mind that curb appeal is what gets buyers in the door. If your home isn’t appealing from the outside, buyers won’t bother to stop for a look inside.”What else can you do? Stash the gifts, they can clutter the living room. Add some fragrance to the air but don’t go overboard. Spruce up the mantle. No personal photos.
“Listing your home for sale during the holidays doesn’t have to make you blue; in fact it can truly brighten your spirits by putting some green in your bank account. Just be sure to focus on making your home a buyer’s dream this holiday season.”Read the full article Fall May Bring Serious Buyers by Phoebe Chongchua.
“Sgt. John Robertson 2nd, an Army mechanic at Texas’s Fort Hood, is fuming about the so-called smart electric meter his local utility has installed on the side of his tidy, 1,800-square-foot home.”
“Like thousands of consumers with the new meters around the country, Sergeant Robertson suspects the device is not as smart as advertised.
“In his case, he says it is inaccurately measuring his family’s power use and driving up his bills — some months by as much as 50 percent, to as high as $320 — since it was installed in December. This, he said, is despite his efforts to cut back on energy use. “But the system seems to plagued with errors.
“Over the last year, as utilities around the country have installed an estimated two million of the new digital meters, power companies have received plenty of complaints — and in some states have been hit by class-action lawsuits — most of them from consumers saying the smart meters are overstating their electrical usage.”
“Using digital technology and computer networking, smart meters can transmit real-time data that is supposed to enable utilities to conserve electricity and better allocate power during parts of the day when overall demand is high. Utilities can also then vary the price for power, by time of day or time of year, based on when it is being used; some are already offering this option to customers.”In theory, consumers are supposed to be better able to adjust their electric use. Operative word being theory.
“But because of faulty technology in some cases, and more often through general shortcomings in consumer education and customer-service support by many utilities, smart meters are leaving many customers dumbfounded.”So, the regulators are taking a closer look, and lawsuits have started. And there’s a lot of money at stake in operating savings for utility companies if the system works correctly.
“When properly done, preapproval can speed up the purchase process by providing a rigorous assessment of the maximum amount a buyer can afford to borrow, based on a formal credit check and verification of income and assets. “
“But prevetting has become more difficult and confusing these days, for borrowers as well as lenders, as a result of lending rules that took effect in January.”
“The rules from the Department of Housing and Urban Development require lenders to issue a binding good-faith estimate of total closing costs within three days of submission of a formal loan application. The formal application is usually made when a preapproval is written.”So, what’s the rub?
“Many lenders are reluctant to be locked into closing costs amid declining property values, and therefore fewer of them, especially the big banks, are providing preapproval letters for a certain loan amount on a property that often has yet to be formally appraised. The problem is particularly acute for buyers who have not yet decided which property they want.”When a problem arises, banks begin to move very, very cautiously.
“By not issuing preapprovals — and all the banks are not doing it — the banks are erring on the side of caution because there’s less risk for them,” said Lou-Ann Smith, a co-owner of Hamilton Ladd Home Loans, a broker in Ridgefield, Conn.”Many sellers and real estate agents, meanwhile, still expect mortgage preapprovals. And,
“Agents embrace preapprovals because they allow them “to show they have a real buyer who’s already started the process,” Mr. Mollica said. And at the peak of the housing market, lenders were more than happy to provide preapproval letters.”Another stumbling block to the revitalization of the housing market? Maybe. Read the full report.
“In this kind of environment it is not unusual that a creditor may want some third party to guarantee the debt of a borrower. Parents may be asked to guarantee a lease for one or more of their offspring. (And which would you prefer: that you guarantee their lease, or that they move back in?) In-laws may be asked to guaranty some debt taken on by newly-weds; and a person venturing into a new business may need to turn to friends and/or family to guarantee a loan for start-up costs.”While guaranteeing a family member’s loan is a traditional way to help someone get started in life or business, it should not be taken lightly. “Loan guarantors need to fully understand the terms of their guarantee.”
The guarantors didn't think it was right or fair that they should be pursued while the original borrower and one of the guarantors stood by. However, the trial court ruled against them; and the appellate court sustained the trial court's decision.
“There are two issues here that other, perhaps more pedestrian, potential guarantors want to keep in mind. More accurately, there is one main issue, and two examples of it. The main issue is simply this: IF YOU ARE GOING TO GUARANTEE A LOAN, BE SURE YOU READ THE DETAILS OF THE GUARANTEE CAREFULLY.”
“The point is simple. If you are going to guarantee a loan – which may be a terrific thing to do for someone – be sure you read the terms of the agreement carefully. Have a trusted attorney review it. You could be glad you did.”Read the full article from Realty Times.
“By proposing to curtail the tax deduction for mortgage interest, the president’s deficit commission is sounding an alarm.”
“The home mortgage deduction is one of the most widely used and expensive tax subsidies. More than 35 million Americans claim it, and the federal government estimates it will cost the Treasury $131 billion in forgone revenue in 2012. Its size, popularity and link to the emotionally charged American notion of homeownership has made it so politically sacrosanct that there are serious doubts whether Congress will even entertain the idea.”So why raise it as an issue? “[T]o jar the public into recognizing the magnitude of the nation’s budget deficit and some of the drastic steps that might be needed to close it.”
“The proposal, part of a draft by co-chairmen Alan K. Simpson and Erskine B. Bowles, suggested that the tax code could be streamlined, and income tax rates drastically lowered, by eliminating the $1.1 trillion in annual tax expenditure entitlements — subsidies and breaks given to targeted businesses and individuals. The commission chairmen also offered the option of capping the deduction at $500,000 on mortgages, rather than the current limit of $1 million.”Once again, the specter of class-warfare is brought to the fore as
“The prospect brought an angry outcry. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi blasted the commission’s suggestions, saying it would force middle-class homeowners to subsidize tax breaks for the wealthy.”
“The mortgage interest deduction is one of the pillars of our national housing policy,” said Michael D. Berman, chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “Limiting its use will have negative repercussions for consumers and home values up and down the housing chain.”
“But tax policy experts say that for all its popularity, the value of the deduction in public policy is debatable. It was intended to encourage homeownership, but housing economists point out that countries like Canada and Australia, which do not allow mortgage interest deductions, have homeownership rates similar to those of the United States.”That may be true, but we are not in Canada or Australia.
“The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp has said it expects bank closures to peak this year after 140 closures in 2009. The bulk of this year's closures have been smaller institutions, each with less than a billion dollars in assets.”
“FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said recently that while the number of failures will exceed last year's tally, the total assets of this year's failures will likely be lower.”The weak link in the American banking world appears to be community banks as “their recovery has lagged behind that of larger institutions and the broader economy.” These banks are susceptible to the problems in the commercial real estate market because they have “higher concentrations” in these loans than bigger banks.
It can be easy for the selling experience to become clouded by emotion. A homeowner may have years of memories stored within the walls of a home. They look at a room, and instead of resale potential, they see a baby's first steps and early Christmas mornings. When the time comes to sell, however, the time has also come to sever emotional ties with a house.
Emotions can cloud your reasoning. And they can misguide you during a very expensive and important business transaction. Sellers sometimes overvalue their homes, adding in sentimental value on top of property value. They refuse offers that, while reasonable, don't add up to the value of their memories. Or they turn down a potential buyer, because they don't garden and won't "leave the rose bushes," or aren't the "type" of person they'd like living in their home.
For a smooth transition, hire an experienced real estate agent. Once you've turned yourself over to their guidance, you can then turn your focus onto the new phase of your life. And agent can help you establish a fair, and unbiased, asking price. They find the sellers. They show the house. And they help you sign on the dotted line. The middle man is extremely beneficial in separating from your emotions.
Your emotions may surface as soon as you list the house for sale, since many agents will suggest you remove many of your personal items from the house for staging. This is neither a personal attack on your decorating nor your memories. Staging is a wonderful way for homeowners to see the house as their future home, instead of seeing your house and your home.
Don't fret over lost memories; take pictures of your home and make a scrapbook. Channel your emotions into the joy of moving. And have fun imagining the new memories you'll make in your new place. This is not a time for mourning, instead it's a time for celebrating!
Although I refinanced my mortgage less than two years ago, interest rates are so low that I plan to refinance again. What costs can I deduct when I refinance for a second time?Folks who refinance and refinance, again, are called serial refinancers. We saw the phenomenon grow during the days of sub-prime lending. But with interest rates now so low, it may make sense to refinance sooner rather than later.
Serial refinancers get an additional tax break on top of the usual mortgage-interest and property-tax deduction. You can deduct the points you pay to get a mortgage in the year you buy a home -- even if the seller paid the points for you (a point is equal to 1% of the loan). You can also deduct points paid to refinance a mortgage, but normally that deduction must be spread out over the life of the loan. So if you paid two points ($5,000 in this example) on a $250,000, 30-year mortgage, you can deduct just $166.67 per year for 30 years.The income tax consequences for making a mistake are not light. So caution is in order.
“ANY broker will tell you that selling an empty apartment is much harder than selling a beautifully furnished one.
“But staging a home with rented furniture can cost thousands of dollars, and that’s money that most sellers aren’t willing to pay. So brokers at Halstead Property and Brown Harris Stevens are using a service that furnishes rooms virtually with the décor of the broker’s choice, adding color and life to photographs of otherwise bland and blank boxes.”Wow, what will they think of next in this economy? I hope it’s not virtual buyers.
“What are the benefits to having a living trust fund compared to a regular will?”
“Living trusts, also called revocable trusts or revocable living trusts, are sometimes touted as an absolute essential.”
“While the person who set up the living trust is still alive, there are advantages for those who will help manage that person’s affairs if they’re unable to.”But living trusts are not fool proof and must be done with the assistance of an attorney. Rely on a do-it-yourself book and you’ll get burned.
Part of the freeze is over for 23 states. Bank of America has announced that foreclosures are resuming in over two dozen states. The bank says in its review, it has not found a single occasion where a foreclosure proceeded in error.The foreclosure freeze was brought about by allegations of wrongdoing by lenders across the country. Here in New Jersey, where foreclosures are supervised by a division of Superior Court, the allegations should prove erroneous. The safeguards are already there.
“LAWYERS representing delinquent homeowners have been shouting for years about documentation problems in residential mortgages. Now that their complaints have gained traction with investors, attorneys general and some state court officials, the question of consequences looms large.
“Is the banks’ sloppy paperwork a matter of simple technicalities that are relatively easy to cure, as the banks contend? Or are there more far-reaching consequences for banks and the institutions that bought mortgage-backed securities during the mania?
“Oddly enough, the answer to both questions may be yes.”All through this new crisis, one comment has been missing. The homeowners (and the hundreds, if not thousands, of sham owners) who borrowed money in a rising economy have simply stopped paying their mortgages.
“HOME buyers concerned about high closing costs in this tight economy might be tempted by a type of loan that requires no cash outlay in exchange for paying a higher interest rate, especially because rates are already at historically low levels.
“But these “zero-cost” or “no-cost” financing deals, as they’re known, could end up costing a borrower dearly over time, some mortgage experts warn. “
“Unlike some similar loans, which don’t require an out-of-pocket outlay but tack on the thousands of dollars in closing costs to the balance, zero- and no-cost loans typically add a half percentage point or so to the rate while not increasing the mortgage balance. “The fees charged by third parties, such as this Company, are paid by the lender and the fees are disclosed on the settlement statement.
“Recently, several major lenders suspended foreclosures as they review irregularities in legal paperwork. These suspensions could have a significant impact on today's homebuyers and sellers.The slowdown will, in our opinion, be temporary. The result of the banks’ review of foreclosure files will find them to be in order. We’ll then see a surge in foreclosures going to auction in the beginning of 2011.
“The extent of disruption will depend largely on how long banks hold up foreclosures in the 23 states that require a judicial foreclosure process. During these suspensions, banks will review affidavits that have been challenged.
“If the problems are resolved quickly, the impact may be minor, according to Rick Sharga, senior vice president at RealtyTrac, a national foreclosure-tracking service in Irvine, Calif.”
“Homeowners in foreclosure who hope to sell may get a "temporary break" before the process moves forward, according to Nick Libert, broker/owner of Exit Strategy Realty in Chicago. That would allow them to live in their home a while longer and potentially close a short sale. Or, they could negotiate a loan modification to avoid foreclosure.”
“Homesellers who aren't in foreclosure also may benefit since banks have taken foreclosed homes off the market and the diminished supply could put upward pressure on prices.”For buyers,
“Potential homebuyers who previously considered shopping for foreclosures may be scared off by the recent negative news reports. But Libert says there's no reason for buyers to delay their plans as long as they can get clear title to the property and title insurance.”For everyone, “The bottom line is that affected housing markets are now in a state of heightened uncertainty that presents both risks and opportunities.”
“The proposal is the first step in the government's effort to clarify how it will seize and dismantle large financial firms that run into trouble. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was given authority to liquidate firms as part of the U.S. effort to prevent another collapse like that of Lehman Brothers, whose demise rippled through the financial sector.”The FDIC is taking the action at the same time that regulators in other countries are addressing the so-called “too big to fail” firms and banks.
it planned to prohibit additional payments to shareholders and long-term debtholders in the event of a firm's demise. The FDIC said it could make additional payments to certain short-term creditors in situations where it maintains "essential operations" or to "minimize losses and maximize recoveries."The proposed rule has been put out for comment. We’ll keep you posted.
“Are you out of your mind to even consider buying a foreclosed property right now?”He tells the tale of Todd Phelps and Paul Whitehead “thought they had won the lottery” when they bought a property at a foreclosure sale.
“Several days later, however, they realized that what they had really bought was a second mortgage from Wachovia on a house that still had an enormous, unpaid primary loan. In other words, they did not own the home free and clear, and the auction company wouldn’t give back their $137,000 check.”Admittedly, these homes are “tempting for scores of first-time homebuyers, second-home seekers and people looking to get an early jump on buying a retirement home while prices and interest rates are low.”
“There’s a way to make essential repairs and add other accouterments without dipping into savings or taking out a home-equity loan. The Federal Housing Administration’s 203(k) rehabilitation program provides for loans covering renovation costs as well as the purchase price of a primary residence — investors excluded — and it allows for just a 3.5 percent down payment.”
“Although the program has been around since 1978, it is not well publicized, and many borrowers mistakenly think they have to buy a wreck in order to qualify. They don’t.”
“Covered repairs include a new roof or heating system (geothermal ones too). Decorative changes, like replacing vinyl with ceramic tile on the kitchen floor replacement, or painting the interior, are covered.”The rates are usually a percentage point higher than conventional mortgages and certain aspects of the program can result in “closing costs $1,000 or more higher than average.”
“Bank of America Corp., the largest U.S. lender, extended a freeze on foreclosures to all 50 states on Friday as concern spread among federal and state officials that homes are being seized based on faulty data. JPMorgan Chase and Ally Financial Inc.’s GMAC Mortgage unit stopped repossession cases in 23 states where courts supervise home seizures — including New Jersey — amid allegations that employees submitted documents with unverified or false information to speed the process.”Statistics from around the country demonstrate that foreclosure sales play a major role in the rebound of the real estate market.
"’Our preliminary review of September foreclosure activity doesn’t show any obvious or notable impact," said Rick Sharga, senior vice president of RealtyTrac. The effects may show up in the October data, he said.’”On the other hand,
“A reduction in foreclosure sales may result in a short-term boost to the nation’s median home price as buyers shy away from distressed properties, said Thomas Lawler, founder and president of Lawler Housing and Economic Consulting in Leesburg, Va.”The halt to pending actions by several lenders means that many property owners are living rent free. That would include those who have made so-called “strategic defaults.” Let’s hope the system straightens out sooner rather than later.
“IF you’re looking to refinance or buy a home, potential lenders and mortgage brokers will be checking your credit scores. And if those scores are being verified, chances are they are going down.
“Yes, you read that correctly. Each time a credit score is pulled from one of the three credit bureaus as part of a loan application, it can decline by as much as 20 points, or more. Call it the Great Credit-Score Ding.”While information about credit scores and their use is becoming more widespread, “few buyers know this goes on — or what to do about it.”
“Most consumers are unaware that this happens,” said Paul Stephens, the director of policy and advocacy for Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a consumer advocacy group in San Diego.The so-called FICO score is sold to the three credit bureaus — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — “which each then use different formulas to compute a consumer’s creditworthiness.”
“It is the “hard pull” inquiry — in which lenders and brokers learn that you are in need of money, and check your credit in order to process your application — that can most damage your score.”This can result in a 20 point or more drop in your score each time you authorize a lender to check your credit.
“So how can borrowers minimize the blow, especially those shopping for the best mortgage rates and working with more than one lender or broker?”
“If all the requests are made within a short time, they usually will count as only one check.”There is some good news, “borrowers who check their own credit scores through a less invasive “soft pull,” to get an estimate of creditworthiness and of loan rates, do not see their scores go down.” So, ask your lender to do “a soft pull before deciding which loan to go with, at which point a formal inquiry is made.”
“The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has authorized lawsuits against more than 50 executives at failed banks across the country in an attempt to recover more than $1 billion of the agency's losses during the credit crisis.
“More than 50 bank officers and directors were negligent, committed fraud or otherwise breached their duties and are, therefore, legally liable, the FDIC concluded after lengthy investigations into the first wave of bank failures.”The FDIC has paid our over $75 billion since 2008 in connection with bank failures. Previous recovery efforts in the late 1980s were successful.
"These investigations are now beginning to produce results, and we anticipate that many more will be authorized," FDIC Chairman Sheila C. Bair said in a statement Friday evening. "As a matter of policy, the FDIC believes strongly in accountability for directors and officers whose personal misconduct led to a bank's failure."Only one lawsuit has been filed so far against officers of IndyMac Bank.
Attorney General Paula T. Dow announced today that Wells Fargo Home Mortgage has agreed to provide New Jersey consumers with nearly $67 million in loan modifications and pay the state $3.98 million to resolve allegations that companies it acquired – Wachovia Corporation, Golden West and World Savings — deceptively marketed adjustable rate mortgage loans.What happened to bring about this announcement? A loan with negative amortization, that's what. Negative amortization loans generally kept your monthly payments artificially low. They were not sufficient to pay down any principal and, in fact, usually neither the interest. At the end of 5 years, you could owe as much as 125% of the money you borrowed.
New Jersey homeowners accounted for about 5 percent of the “Pick-a-Payment” loans acquired by Wells Fargo as part of its acquisitions of Wachovia, Golden West and World Savings in 2008. Under terms of the settlement, Wells Fargo will provide across-the-board forgiveness of accrued interest and late fees for eligible delinquent borrowers who live in the homes on which they took out “Pick-a-Payment” mortgages.
Starting on December 18, 2010, the company also will provide loan modification terms that enable affordable payments and reduce principal for some consumers. Modified loan terms will vary according to the circumstances of the borrower, but can include principal forgiveness, loan extension, interest rate reduction, and principal forbearance (which gives the borrower additional time to pay off the loan principal). Borrowers who remain current on their modified payments over three years will earn additional principal forgiveness. Borrowers who qualify may also convert into a fixed rate loan. All modification fees and pre-payment penalties will be waived. The modification program will extend until June 30, 2013.I'm sure by now we are tired of reading about lender's abuse of their customers but it's good to see that the state is doing something to correct a past abuse.
“U.S. Representative Robert Andrews (D-N.J.) and Tom Rooney (R-Fla) offered up new legislation to Congress last week. H.R. 6133, "Prompt Decision forThis is certainly welcome news. It's goal-
Qualification of Short Sale Act of 2010," is an effort from Congress to help keep potential buyers from walking away from short sales, simply because lenders take months to respond to their offers.”
“This legislation aims to "require the lender or servicer of a home mortgage,upon a request by the homeowner for a short sale, to make a prompt decisionThe bill is strongly supported by the National Association of REALTORS. We have to say that it is long overdue.
whether to allow the sale." (Library of Congress) “
“Hopefully, if this bill passes into law, homeowners will find relief from their mortgage woes, and will be able to sell their home without having to be
foreclosed upon.”
THE new exhibition at the Keith de Lellis Gallery, “New York: A Bird’s-Eye View,” has a striking assortment of aerial views of the city. No image is more arresting than that of the Navy dirigible Los Angeles docking at the mooring post of the Empire State Building, a giant cigarlike cylinder coming nose-to-nose with the tallest building in the world.Now, I didn't know that. Did you? Read the full article.
That the photograph is a composite, a fake, is disappointing but not surprising: no airship ever docked there, and indeed the whole mooring mast concept was a bit of a stunt itself.
"FDIC and NCUA insurance protect up to $250,000 per depositor and if a financial institution doesn't have that protection, pass on it," Wang wrote. "There's no reason why you should put your savings in a bank that isn't insured.""Interest rates are another factor, and banks may offer a promotional period that lasts a set amount of time. Wang said consumers should make sure the "post-teaser" level is comparable to other offers.
“RECENT calls for another federal stimulus package raise an important question: Before considering costly short-term measures to raise overall consumer demand, have we done enough to ensure that financial markets will work properly and lead us to recovery? For housing — the sector at the center of the crisis — the answer is no. But the good news is that it might be possible to improve the housing market and invigorate the economy in a way that won’t require a costly stimulus package.
“In a normally functioning mortgage market, almost all homeowners would have refinanced their mortgages to take advantage of low rates. Yet today, low interest rates are doing little to stimulate the housing market because of other stresses, including declines in house prices, falling household incomes and banks’ wariness of making loans.
“To change this dynamic, we propose a new program through which the federal government would direct the public and quasi-public entities that guarantee mortgages — Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, the Department of Veterans Affairs loan-guarantee program and the Federal Housing Administration — to make it far easier and quicker for homeowners to refinance.”Whoa, haven’t we been down this road? But, they write,
“This program would be simple: the agencies would direct loan servicers — the middlemen who monitor and report loan payments — to send a short application to all eligible borrowers promising to allow them to refinance with minimal paperwork. Servicers would receive a fixed fee for each mortgage they refinanced, which would be rolled into the mortgage to eliminate costs to taxpayers.”How does this work in dollars and cents?
“Consider a family that bought a home in 2006 for $225,000, taking out a $200,000 fixed-rate mortgage at the prevailing 6 percent interest rate with monthly payments of about $1,200. That home is now worth about $175,000. The family still owes $189,000 and thus cannot refinance because they are underwater.
“But under our proposal, the family would be offered a new mortgage at today’s prevailing rate of 4.3 percent. The family would see a 15 percent decline in their monthly mortgage payment, saving more than $2,000 per year. This would not only help homeowners through the current crisis, but would be the equivalent of a 26-year tax cut of more than 4 percent of income, assuming the family spends around 30 percent of income on housing.”But prior experience has shown mortgage programs to be a bust. They know that and ask,
“What went wrong? First, the program was not widely publicized relative to the federal government’s efforts to help with more modest loan modifications. Second, the refinancings require substantial upfront costs for borrowers. Third, many borrowers — those with second liens or shaky incomes — were locked out. (About 20 percent of all borrowers with federally backed mortgages have a second lien.) Last, many borrowers do not know the current value of their homes, and are reluctant to pay to get an appraisal only to be turned down for a refinancing.
“THE program we propose addresses these issues. It would have minimal costs, which we would roll into the cost of the mortgage rather than forcing homeowners to make a big upfront payment. For mortgages with second liens, the government could request a blanket approval from all servicers to allow the new mortgages to have priority over existing second ones. It is in the interest of the servicers of second liens to allow such refinancings, because they reduce payments on the first mortgage and thus lower default risk on the second lien.”Seems like common sense to me, what do you think? Read the full Op-ed.
